🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a reassessment. Throughout its history, an celebration that began as a festivity and recollection of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has taken on a commercial tone, growing to encompass gatherings where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to speak with Caucasian groups about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s created a surge in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The wave has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was created in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in February, but also in autumn in the United Kingdom, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Holland.

The month has evolved since its inception, focusing less on the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and extensively acknowledging the impact Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the method the month is celebrated is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a good lesson in how co-option leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has stymied the point of it, which is to address systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Troubling Time

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to reconsider Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the summer we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in British history. a prominent political figure, the Black leader of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament feels emboldened to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in parts of a city is a reason for concern. Meanwhile, extreme conservative groups are expanding in Europe as a complete entity.

In the United States, a colossal assault against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been taken, often successfully, to the supreme judicial bodies of the state. A campaign to erase Black history and narrative from the records is in progress. One of the former president's early administrative commands aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the renowned cultural organization, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to alter the country's historical narrative” by representing the nation “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the month symbolises how insufficiently it can be influential if it is restricted to either obligatory business commemorations, or politically neutered festivities of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the realities of the present. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is required. Denise Miller, a professor at University of Greenwich, put it best when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a fleeting performance rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Figuring out how to adjust, modify and expand actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such times of discouragement and concern is a challenging endeavor. There is a inclination to just eliminate things like Black History Month entirely, thinking they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an time that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and legacy of racial movements – community-based BLM initiatives, inclusion and equity efforts, and indeed, including corporate presentations – represent an infrastructure that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month seem? Firstly, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed across all seasons (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not avoid politics, and leaves space for individuals, particularly the younger generation, to express their concerns and stories. What use is simple recognition of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Institutions who observe it should not be comforted with the non-confrontational words of hidden discrimination and alertness to subtle slights, but challenged by the risks that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, urgent, and adaptive. It could be that an complete renaming is necessary – Contemporary Black History Month.